County Data
Choctaw County, Alabama
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Choctaw County
Relatively Low
Hazard Risk (11.2/100)
Good
Solar (4.6 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Choctaw County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 19.0 |
| Landslide | Relatively Moderate | 16.4 |
| Hurricane | Relatively Moderate | 16.1 |
| Lightning | Relatively Low | 13.5 |
| Riverine Flooding | Relatively Moderate | 11.4 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 43°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 11.3″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.6 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 0.1 m/s |
| Soil Type | Sandy Clay Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
54
Autonomy Score
Get Your Choctaw County Guide
Enter any zip code in Choctaw County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Choctaw County, Alabama?
- Choctaw County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Low based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Tornado, Landslide, Hurricane. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Choctaw County good for solar power?
- Choctaw County has a good solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Choctaw County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Choctaw County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Choctaw County?
- Choctaw County has an autonomy score of 54. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.