County Data
Pulaski County, Kentucky
Self-reliance and preparedness data for Pulaski County
Relatively Low
Hazard Risk (12.0/100)
Moderate
Solar (4.1 kWh/m²/day)
Natural Hazard Risks in Pulaski County
| Hazard | Risk Rating | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 24.1 |
| Strong Wind | Relatively High | 22.4 |
| Cold Wave | Relatively Moderate | 19.8 |
| Landslide | Relatively Moderate | 19.8 |
| Ice Storm | Relatively Moderate | 19.2 |
Source: FEMA National Risk Index. Scores 0–100, higher = more risk.
Climate Profile
Temperature & Growing Season
| January Avg | 30°F |
Water & Energy
| Annual Precipitation | 6.5″ |
| Solar Potential | 4.1 kWh/m²/day |
| Wind Speed | 0.3 m/s |
| Soil Type | Silt Loam |
Local Species
62
Edible species
27
Medicinal species
50
Autonomy Score
Get Your Pulaski County Guide
Enter any zip code in Pulaski County for a full location-specific guide with planting calendars, foraging data, water strategy, and personalized action plans.
Full guide from $14.99 — printable, offline-ready
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the biggest natural hazards in Pulaski County, Kentucky?
- Pulaski County has an overall hazard rating of Relatively Low based on FEMA National Risk Index data. The top threats are Tornado, Strong Wind, Cold Wave. Each hazard is scored 0–100 by likelihood and expected impact.
- Is Pulaski County good for solar power?
- Pulaski County has a moderate solar rating. Solar potential is based on average daily irradiance (kWh/m²/day), which determines how much energy rooftop or ground-mounted panels can produce year-round.
- How many edible plants grow in Pulaski County?
- Our database identifies 62 edible plant species in Pulaski County based on regional flora data, USDA hardiness zone, and iNaturalist observations. The full field guide includes identification notes, preparation methods, and seasonal availability.
- What is the autonomy score for Pulaski County?
- Pulaski County has an autonomy score of 50. This composite score measures local self-reliance potential across water access, food production capacity, energy resources, and supply chain resilience. Higher scores indicate greater potential for self-sufficiency.